Chlorine Dioxide vs Ozone for Cooling Towers and Drinking Water
Chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) and ozone (O₃) are both strong oxidising biocides used in cooling tower and drinking water treatment. Ozone has a higher oxidation potential and is highly effective at the point of dosing, but has a half-life of around 20 minutes in water and leaves no measurable residual, so secondary disinfection is still required throughout the distribution system. Ozone also forms bromate (a regulated by-product) when bromide is present in the source water (WHO and US EPA guidance). Chlorine dioxide provides a sustained, measurable residual at pH 4-10, penetrates biofilm, does not form trihalomethanes (THMs) or bromate, and avoids the capital cost of on-site ozone generation. For UK cooling towers under HSG274 and for distributed potable water systems, ClO₂ is normally the more practical choice. ChloroKlean Plus L20 is BPR-compliant for PT5 (drinking water) and PT11 (cooling system preservation).
- Author
- Gavin Owen, Managing Director, ChloroKlean
- Key Advantage of ClO₂
- Provides a sustained, measurable residual across the whole distribution system; ozone does not.
- By-products
- ClO₂ produces no THMs, HAAs, or bromate. Ozone forms bromate where bromide is present, plus aldehydes and ketones from organic matter.
- pH Range
- ClO₂ effective at pH 4-10. Ozone effective but consumed faster at higher pH and elevated temperatures.
- Regulatory Sources
- WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, HSE HSG274 Part 1, US EPA Stage 1 D/DBPR, DWI guidance, EU BPR 528/2012
- UK Compliance
- Both can be used under UK GB BPR with correct PT5/PT11 authorisation. ChloroKlean Plus L20 is fully BPR-compliant for water treatment applications.